Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
NFL draft
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="POKE1911" data-source="post: 1780341" data-attributes="member: 24536"><p>I didn't say anything about Weeden. Although he is a much better, and proven quaterback. All I know is Top 10 draft are expected to start or challenge for a starting position. Here you have a guy who has played the position a little over a year and 1/2 Against OU, OSU, Texas, and Araknsas he had more picks than touchdowns. Is Tannehill "THAT" much better than Matt Moore that they should leverage their future on him. Maybe pick up a stud wr or OL some pass support in the first round then see if you can catch a tannehill/weeded/foles in the 2nd round. </p><p></p><p>I am an OSU fan but not homer. I could see where tannehill could have more potential than weeden especially with age. However he is currently nowhere near the qb BW3 is. A top 10 pick should go to a proven commodity with potential, not just potential.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="POKE1911, post: 1780341, member: 24536"] I didn't say anything about Weeden. Although he is a much better, and proven quaterback. All I know is Top 10 draft are expected to start or challenge for a starting position. Here you have a guy who has played the position a little over a year and 1/2 Against OU, OSU, Texas, and Araknsas he had more picks than touchdowns. Is Tannehill "THAT" much better than Matt Moore that they should leverage their future on him. Maybe pick up a stud wr or OL some pass support in the first round then see if you can catch a tannehill/weeded/foles in the 2nd round. I am an OSU fan but not homer. I could see where tannehill could have more potential than weeden especially with age. However he is currently nowhere near the qb BW3 is. A top 10 pick should go to a proven commodity with potential, not just potential. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
NFL draft
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom