Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
NICS denial act
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sherrick13" data-source="post: 3890144" data-attributes="member: 9406"><p>Ok, so my question about actual information concerning delays wasn't answered. I'm assuming it is an opinion and might be right and might be wrong. That document issued just isn't detailed enough about the process to REALLY know what they are going to do.</p><p></p><p>But here is my opinion on it based on working with several federal LE/regulatory agencies in my 1st career and a few now in my 2nd career.</p><p></p><p>First of all, why the new rule was passed. The main two reasons this was done is </p><p></p><p>1- to just make the acquisition of firearms a bit more of a hassle and expense. The .gov is ALWAYS looking to do this. </p><p></p><p>2- and this is the important one. In a lot of the mass shootings the shooter had passed a background check or gone through the NICS system and all lot of blame was thrown at the Federal .gov. This is a way to shift some/all of the blame to the locals in the future. However, there has to have been a notification to the locals for the blame to shift. </p><p></p><p>The actual process isn't going to be on a case by case basis. The notifications will be in batches. So at the end of every day, third day or maybe even week a data file for each jurisdiction will be transmitted to the departments with the denials/delays came from.</p><p></p><p>Why do I think it will include delays? For the following. </p><p></p><p>The .gov is always looking to **** with gun owners.</p><p></p><p>The information will be given to them for both denials AND delays. They ain't going to sort that ****. They will just batch it all.</p><p></p><p>And for the number 2 above. The MORE names they can throw at the local PDs means a greater chance they will be able to shift blame to them when another mass shooting happens.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That is my opinion with basis. I have no insider information. I hope I'm wrong and it is just denials. But I just don't trust the feds....at all... to ever do the right thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sherrick13, post: 3890144, member: 9406"] Ok, so my question about actual information concerning delays wasn't answered. I'm assuming it is an opinion and might be right and might be wrong. That document issued just isn't detailed enough about the process to REALLY know what they are going to do. But here is my opinion on it based on working with several federal LE/regulatory agencies in my 1st career and a few now in my 2nd career. First of all, why the new rule was passed. The main two reasons this was done is 1- to just make the acquisition of firearms a bit more of a hassle and expense. The .gov is ALWAYS looking to do this. 2- and this is the important one. In a lot of the mass shootings the shooter had passed a background check or gone through the NICS system and all lot of blame was thrown at the Federal .gov. This is a way to shift some/all of the blame to the locals in the future. However, there has to have been a notification to the locals for the blame to shift. The actual process isn't going to be on a case by case basis. The notifications will be in batches. So at the end of every day, third day or maybe even week a data file for each jurisdiction will be transmitted to the departments with the denials/delays came from. Why do I think it will include delays? For the following. The .gov is always looking to **** with gun owners. The information will be given to them for both denials AND delays. They ain't going to sort that ****. They will just batch it all. And for the number 2 above. The MORE names they can throw at the local PDs means a greater chance they will be able to shift blame to them when another mass shooting happens. That is my opinion with basis. I have no insider information. I hope I'm wrong and it is just denials. But I just don't trust the feds....at all... to ever do the right thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
NICS denial act
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom