Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA Says It Was A Mistake To Call Texas Open Carry Gun Protesters Weird
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blaine007" data-source="post: 2538775" data-attributes="member: 33980"><p>Dave, I think you're getting too deep for me on this one. Point blank, I like the idea of law abiding citizens being able to protect themselves and others. I don't like criminals having access to firearms. Especially violent ones. Oklahoma has a partial answer to the open carry law for the time being that to qualify for open carry, you must have a CCW permit, which I like. That proves to me that you aren't a criminal. If I have a way of proving that you're a bad guy, then you go to jail if in possession of a firearm. My version of constitutional carry doesn't allow for criminals to carry-period. You'll have to point that one out to me in the constitution where it says I'm wrong about that. I guess you can say omission works both ways on that thought. Otherwise, wouldn't you think a crap load of convicted felons would've sued for violating that right to carry being taken from them? And finally, I know there is no system in place that allows me to know ahead of time that someone has a privilege to carry or not without physically checking. I'm a little frustrated about that. Surely you would like to know if the guy walking down the street in front of your house with a long gun slung over his shoulder was previously convicted of robbery or home invasion type crimes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blaine007, post: 2538775, member: 33980"] Dave, I think you're getting too deep for me on this one. Point blank, I like the idea of law abiding citizens being able to protect themselves and others. I don't like criminals having access to firearms. Especially violent ones. Oklahoma has a partial answer to the open carry law for the time being that to qualify for open carry, you must have a CCW permit, which I like. That proves to me that you aren't a criminal. If I have a way of proving that you're a bad guy, then you go to jail if in possession of a firearm. My version of constitutional carry doesn't allow for criminals to carry-period. You'll have to point that one out to me in the constitution where it says I'm wrong about that. I guess you can say omission works both ways on that thought. Otherwise, wouldn't you think a crap load of convicted felons would've sued for violating that right to carry being taken from them? And finally, I know there is no system in place that allows me to know ahead of time that someone has a privilege to carry or not without physically checking. I'm a little frustrated about that. Surely you would like to know if the guy walking down the street in front of your house with a long gun slung over his shoulder was previously convicted of robbery or home invasion type crimes. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA Says It Was A Mistake To Call Texas Open Carry Gun Protesters Weird
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom