Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
NSW SEALS ADOPT GLOCK 19 REPLACING SIG P226 MK25
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fyrtwuck" data-source="post: 2877886" data-attributes="member: 23"><p>I have both the 19 and the 226, although, not the coveted "Navy" 226.</p><p></p><p>The 226 is heavier than the 19. </p><p>Round capacity is the same. </p><p>The 19 is smaller. </p><p>The DA/SA trigger on the 226 takes some getting used to, but it can be done. </p><p>As an individual, customer support for the Glock is much easier than Sig. I'm sure the gov will jump ahead of the line with a contract. </p><p>The Glock was designed so that any part that malfunctioned could be just pulled out and replaced by anyone. Only a 3/32" punch is needed. I can't do that with any of my Sigs. </p><p></p><p>If they wanted to have a smaller size with the same capacity, why didn't they just move over to the Sig M-11? Both the 19 and the M-11 are really close in size with the same round capacity. Weight will differ. </p><p></p><p>I'm surprised that if they were going to go with Glock, why not the 17? More rounds and not much weight increase.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fyrtwuck, post: 2877886, member: 23"] I have both the 19 and the 226, although, not the coveted "Navy" 226. The 226 is heavier than the 19. Round capacity is the same. The 19 is smaller. The DA/SA trigger on the 226 takes some getting used to, but it can be done. As an individual, customer support for the Glock is much easier than Sig. I'm sure the gov will jump ahead of the line with a contract. The Glock was designed so that any part that malfunctioned could be just pulled out and replaced by anyone. Only a 3/32" punch is needed. I can't do that with any of my Sigs. If they wanted to have a smaller size with the same capacity, why didn't they just move over to the Sig M-11? Both the 19 and the M-11 are really close in size with the same round capacity. Weight will differ. I'm surprised that if they were going to go with Glock, why not the 17? More rounds and not much weight increase. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
NSW SEALS ADOPT GLOCK 19 REPLACING SIG P226 MK25
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom