Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Obama Announces 214 More Sentence Commutations: 50+ with Firearms Charges
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MadDogs" data-source="post: 2897215" data-attributes="member: 11175"><p>They typically don’t dance very well unless they have a lot of beer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So why did you say …</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>… if you have not looked at these commutations?</p><p></p><p>So people who are involved in criminal enterprise involving drug trafficking and money laundering should not be in jail? Or is it that you will simply agree with anything Obama because he is to you the ideological opposite of those pesky Republicans who your liberal coloring books have told you have a platform that is “prejudicial and discriminatory to people of color?</p><p></p><p>Suggestion? Instead of being intellectually dishonest and try to run away from your post(s), why don’t you just explain them?</p><p></p><p>One … Why do you think these people should not be in jail if you have not drilled down into what they are in prison for in the first place?</p><p></p><p>Two … Why shouldn’t people convicted in federal court for felony criminal enterprise not serve their time?</p><p></p><p>Three … Why did you state on the other thread that “the republican platform still (i.e., today; currently) has policies that are prejudicial and discriminatory in regard to brown and black people …”?</p><p></p><p>Look, I am not doing anything but asking you to explain what you said. Why won’t you do that? You ask people to explain their posts. But you can’t you do that for your own?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MadDogs, post: 2897215, member: 11175"] They typically don’t dance very well unless they have a lot of beer. So why did you say … … if you have not looked at these commutations? So people who are involved in criminal enterprise involving drug trafficking and money laundering should not be in jail? Or is it that you will simply agree with anything Obama because he is to you the ideological opposite of those pesky Republicans who your liberal coloring books have told you have a platform that is “prejudicial and discriminatory to people of color? Suggestion? Instead of being intellectually dishonest and try to run away from your post(s), why don’t you just explain them? One … Why do you think these people should not be in jail if you have not drilled down into what they are in prison for in the first place? Two … Why shouldn’t people convicted in federal court for felony criminal enterprise not serve their time? Three … Why did you state on the other thread that “the republican platform still (i.e., today; currently) has policies that are prejudicial and discriminatory in regard to brown and black people …”? Look, I am not doing anything but asking you to explain what you said. Why won’t you do that? You ask people to explain their posts. But you can’t you do that for your own? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Obama Announces 214 More Sentence Commutations: 50+ with Firearms Charges
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom