Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Objectivity needed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soonerwings" data-source="post: 3228835" data-attributes="member: 8035"><p>But 1289.16 lists defense of any person, ones property, or home as lawful cause. There is no duty to retreat in Oklahoma law, so I’m not sure why you’d say that opening the door negates self defense.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, 1289.25 says that the law PRESUMES that one who uses defensive force (which includes pointing a firearm) has a reasonable fear of imminent harm if he has reason to believe that a forceful/illegal entry is being made. Note that the attempt to enter doesn’t have to be made in reality, but the defendant has to have reason to believe that someone is trying to get in. </p><p></p><p>Does that change things in your mind?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soonerwings, post: 3228835, member: 8035"] But 1289.16 lists defense of any person, ones property, or home as lawful cause. There is no duty to retreat in Oklahoma law, so I’m not sure why you’d say that opening the door negates self defense. Additionally, 1289.25 says that the law PRESUMES that one who uses defensive force (which includes pointing a firearm) has a reasonable fear of imminent harm if he has reason to believe that a forceful/illegal entry is being made. Note that the attempt to enter doesn’t have to be made in reality, but the defendant has to have reason to believe that someone is trying to get in. Does that change things in your mind? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Objectivity needed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom