Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Officer with Rifle Takes Out Alleged Police Attacker from 180+ Yards
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gadsden" data-source="post: 3868476" data-attributes="member: 49555"><p>First of all I certainly don't need you to tell me what training says about using deadly force or how to write a report or how to testify. Next, what exactly does any of that have to do with whether or not the officer was a combat veteran or if he even served in the military? In case you've forgotten that is the point I made originally that you were disputing. I can only guess you no longer want to discuss that considering how absurd your point was.</p><p></p><p>As far as lawsuits go, especially considering the frivolous nature of many of them, they are a part of the job. In other words, if an officer is doing their job it is almost a given that he (or she) will be sued for something. That said, I don't need to hear your story to know how the system works, I have plenty of my own.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, please show me any evidence suggesting that this officer shot to kill. I'm pretty certain he shot to stop the threat and the result was the perpetrator received a fatal wound. Bottom line, good shoot. The good guys went home, citizens lives were saved and the threat was over, job well done. Give that officer a medal !</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gadsden, post: 3868476, member: 49555"] First of all I certainly don't need you to tell me what training says about using deadly force or how to write a report or how to testify. Next, what exactly does any of that have to do with whether or not the officer was a combat veteran or if he even served in the military? In case you've forgotten that is the point I made originally that you were disputing. I can only guess you no longer want to discuss that considering how absurd your point was. As far as lawsuits go, especially considering the frivolous nature of many of them, they are a part of the job. In other words, if an officer is doing their job it is almost a given that he (or she) will be sued for something. That said, I don't need to hear your story to know how the system works, I have plenty of my own. Lastly, please show me any evidence suggesting that this officer shot to kill. I'm pretty certain he shot to stop the threat and the result was the perpetrator received a fatal wound. Bottom line, good shoot. The good guys went home, citizens lives were saved and the threat was over, job well done. Give that officer a medal ! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Officer with Rifle Takes Out Alleged Police Attacker from 180+ Yards
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom