Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Officer with Rifle Takes Out Alleged Police Attacker from 180+ Yards
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 3869535" data-attributes="member: 42584"><p>OK, I'll play the devils advocate here and go with 'ferrets' game, which would require that LEO's that have to shoot someone where that shot ends up being fatal, be involuntarily retired.</p><p> </p><p> - Lets expand that call for mandatory retirement to medical professionals that have a patient die while under their care.</p><p> - I guess we could also add Veterinarians that are occasionally needed to put down our much loved 'fur-babies'. </p><p> - I suppose that we should add those that work on the kill floor of slaughter houses.</p><p> - And, of course let us not leave out most ranchers that, during their lifetime, had to put down one or more of their livestock.</p><p> - Then comes the question about what to do with someone that kills a varmint. Should they be forced into retirement as well?</p><p> - Talking about varmints, killing to defend ones family or self even if it was deemed to be justifiable would require, under 'ferrets' ideas, that the shooter be retired from their livelihood, and then what, live on welfare? </p><p></p><p>Once fleshed out, the idea put forth by 'ferret' seems to present a dilemma. Perhaps a retooling of the thought processes are in order, eh? <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😁" title="Beaming face with smiling eyes :grin:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f601.png" data-shortname=":grin:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 3869535, member: 42584"] OK, I'll play the devils advocate here and go with 'ferrets' game, which would require that LEO's that have to shoot someone where that shot ends up being fatal, be involuntarily retired. - Lets expand that call for mandatory retirement to medical professionals that have a patient die while under their care. - I guess we could also add Veterinarians that are occasionally needed to put down our much loved 'fur-babies'. - I suppose that we should add those that work on the kill floor of slaughter houses. - And, of course let us not leave out most ranchers that, during their lifetime, had to put down one or more of their livestock. - Then comes the question about what to do with someone that kills a varmint. Should they be forced into retirement as well? - Talking about varmints, killing to defend ones family or self even if it was deemed to be justifiable would require, under 'ferrets' ideas, that the shooter be retired from their livelihood, and then what, live on welfare? Once fleshed out, the idea put forth by 'ferret' seems to present a dilemma. Perhaps a retooling of the thought processes are in order, eh? 😁 [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Officer with Rifle Takes Out Alleged Police Attacker from 180+ Yards
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom