Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Earthquakes confirmed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1krr" data-source="post: 2738705" data-attributes="member: 750"><p>Hold up guys, what are we debating? Atmospheric co2 in the upper atmosphere where it is suspected of contributing to climate change is not the same airmass that plants interact with near the surface. I don't know to what extent greenhouse effect works outside of the emissive radiation frequencies (coming in white and reflective radiation in the IR band) but that happens in two different places if it is in fact true.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: if I were to be suspect of the greenhouse effect as I understand it, it would be because it requires a few things to work. Radiation that can pass though the atmopshere to be absorbed where it is reradiated at frequency the atmosphere is opaque too. I've seen it described as energy being absorbed by greenhouse gas from the surface and re-radiated to the surface but there is no mechanics I know of where an atom will absorb then emit a photon in any particular direction that are at work in the atmosphere. This is where I ride the fence interested to learn more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1krr, post: 2738705, member: 750"] Hold up guys, what are we debating? Atmospheric co2 in the upper atmosphere where it is suspected of contributing to climate change is not the same airmass that plants interact with near the surface. I don't know to what extent greenhouse effect works outside of the emissive radiation frequencies (coming in white and reflective radiation in the IR band) but that happens in two different places if it is in fact true. EDIT: if I were to be suspect of the greenhouse effect as I understand it, it would be because it requires a few things to work. Radiation that can pass though the atmopshere to be absorbed where it is reradiated at frequency the atmosphere is opaque too. I've seen it described as energy being absorbed by greenhouse gas from the surface and re-radiated to the surface but there is no mechanics I know of where an atom will absorb then emit a photon in any particular direction that are at work in the atmosphere. This is where I ride the fence interested to learn more. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Earthquakes confirmed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom