Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Earthquakes confirmed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eagle Eye" data-source="post: 2738792" data-attributes="member: 34489"><p>Greening does not equal more biomass. Greening refers to the leafing out of vegetation. The relationship between c02 and greening does not imply that co2 results in higher biomass (C uptake by plants). It only means that leafing out is affected. So the premise of your arguments i completely beside the point that i am making, which is, that CO2 fertilization will not cause a linear increase in biomass production because other nutrients, such as water, N, P, K. are limiting this process.</p><p>Bottom line is you are using terminology incorrectly when implying that the effect of co2 on greening equals the effect of c02 on productivity. </p><p></p><p>And to your statement "I can't believe I'm having to post links to articles about CO2 fertilization and the greening of the planet that has occurred as a result" is baseless because it is evident that you don't understand what you are posting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eagle Eye, post: 2738792, member: 34489"] Greening does not equal more biomass. Greening refers to the leafing out of vegetation. The relationship between c02 and greening does not imply that co2 results in higher biomass (C uptake by plants). It only means that leafing out is affected. So the premise of your arguments i completely beside the point that i am making, which is, that CO2 fertilization will not cause a linear increase in biomass production because other nutrients, such as water, N, P, K. are limiting this process. Bottom line is you are using terminology incorrectly when implying that the effect of co2 on greening equals the effect of c02 on productivity. And to your statement "I can't believe I'm having to post links to articles about CO2 fertilization and the greening of the planet that has occurred as a result" is baseless because it is evident that you don't understand what you are posting. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Earthquakes confirmed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom