Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Earthquakes confirmed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorjj" data-source="post: 2738965" data-attributes="member: 7292"><p>The article you posted still showed a 9% increase in biomass production over controls even after several years. It never showed a decrease below controls. Seriously, after your admission of obvious trolling on the other aspects of this thread, I must admit, you trolled me here pretty good. I mean, there's no one, not even the most militant of alarmists who think that C02 fertilization doesn't occur.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorjj, post: 2738965, member: 7292"] The article you posted still showed a 9% increase in biomass production over controls even after several years. It never showed a decrease below controls. Seriously, after your admission of obvious trolling on the other aspects of this thread, I must admit, you trolled me here pretty good. I mean, there's no one, not even the most militant of alarmists who think that C02 fertilization doesn't occur. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Earthquakes confirmed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom