Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Subsidies
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 1609948" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>not true... I put a link to the CBO document in question. </p><p>the congressional budget office like the FTC and FCC is a federal agency, unlike politicians are bound by criminal laws against printing intentional falsehoods. </p><p></p><p>Fox news and Cato institute are not handicap by the same criminal laws. unlike CBO, which are bound by criminal laws. which is more believable? </p><p></p><p>if you call data from the CBO spin, information from Cato institute fact, then this exchange is a waste of my time. </p><p></p><p>anytime I posted hard data, unlike your posts. I put where data come from. otherwise it would be spin, like ALL of your articles/links posted in this thread. either the data is not verifiable and/or put in a form that data takes extensive research to be verifiable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 1609948, member: 7629"] not true... I put a link to the CBO document in question. the congressional budget office like the FTC and FCC is a federal agency, unlike politicians are bound by criminal laws against printing intentional falsehoods. Fox news and Cato institute are not handicap by the same criminal laws. unlike CBO, which are bound by criminal laws. which is more believable? if you call data from the CBO spin, information from Cato institute fact, then this exchange is a waste of my time. anytime I posted hard data, unlike your posts. I put where data come from. otherwise it would be spin, like ALL of your articles/links posted in this thread. either the data is not verifiable and/or put in a form that data takes extensive research to be verifiable. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oil Subsidies
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom