Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OK Republican calling for forced vaccininations - as predicted
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MadDogs" data-source="post: 2756696" data-attributes="member: 11175"><p>Nothing is 100%. Anyone capable of holding a spoon should get that. Back to square one. The odd of one getting a disease are minimized if they are vaccinated. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And more people that are vaccinated that don’t catch a disease than there are those who are vaccinated who do. Following your logic I would suggest that should never gamble with real money. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the point is to get a flu shot so you don’t catch the flu to give to your kids. My personal experience with such seems to work pretty well. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Works both ways. The world doesn’t revolve around you either. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, which risk is greater? Getting sick from not having a vaccine or getting sick from the vaccine? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Speaking of marginalizing. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Have not suggested anyone be forced to have a vaccine, have I? What I would suggest is that if you didn’t want to have your children, yourself or your pets vaccinated; you should be made aware of possible consequences should the fruit of your loins get someone sick. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don’t know &#8230; maybe because they are proven to stop the spread of diseases two or more years down the proverbial road if more people are vaccinated? Maybe it’s like carrying an extra mag for Glock 19 because you never know when 16 rounds might not be enough? </p><p></p><p>Let me ask you this again. Do you have pets and do you vaccinate your pets?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MadDogs, post: 2756696, member: 11175"] Nothing is 100%. Anyone capable of holding a spoon should get that. Back to square one. The odd of one getting a disease are minimized if they are vaccinated. And more people that are vaccinated that don’t catch a disease than there are those who are vaccinated who do. Following your logic I would suggest that should never gamble with real money. I think the point is to get a flu shot so you don’t catch the flu to give to your kids. My personal experience with such seems to work pretty well. Works both ways. The world doesn’t revolve around you either. Again, which risk is greater? Getting sick from not having a vaccine or getting sick from the vaccine? Speaking of marginalizing. Have not suggested anyone be forced to have a vaccine, have I? What I would suggest is that if you didn’t want to have your children, yourself or your pets vaccinated; you should be made aware of possible consequences should the fruit of your loins get someone sick. I don’t know … maybe because they are proven to stop the spread of diseases two or more years down the proverbial road if more people are vaccinated? Maybe it’s like carrying an extra mag for Glock 19 because you never know when 16 rounds might not be enough? Let me ask you this again. Do you have pets and do you vaccinate your pets? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OK Republican calling for forced vaccininations - as predicted
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom