Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OK Republican calling for forced vaccininations - as predicted
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 2757433" data-attributes="member: 24531"><p>LOL, he was probably threatened if that is the case...but if it is the case, I want to know more and the truth and I will look into it Rick. I would also remind you that snopes is run by a left-wing "crazy cat lady" and has been challenged for inserting their agenda into their opinions. The man & woman that own it are nobody...me and you could start a site like that and get people to use our information as fact. They have dispelled myths and I'm not saying everything they say is wrong.</p><p></p><p>I thought of another analogy on the mandate of vaccines that might strike a nerve for people who are objectively trying to understand the for/against arguments. As you know driverless cars are on the rise and are being pushed by the progressive elite. Any bad or risk is ignored and we are told that they will make us all safer. At some point int he near future, there could be an argument for a mandate that you MUST use a computer-driven car and those who want to drive their own car are putting us all at risk. Nevermind those responsible drivers that have not hurt anyone, if they dare to want the freedom to travel as they see fit, they must be punished in some way. I suspect many people on this board who would support a vaccine mandate would be against a driverless car mandate...it is the same principle and I thought was a good way to help those who are trying to make up their mind on a vaccine mandate see this principle applied elsewhere. You can encourage and support vaccines without wanting to use the police state to force your fellow citizens into it. If it is such a good, safe thing, then it should stand on its own merit and not have to be forced. Dennis, Rick, what are your thoughts on this analogy?</p><p></p><p>Vaccine do cause injury/reactions and the first step to showing you are intellectually honest is to acknowledge the gov't has paid out billions in damages, as well as the fact that the drug companies list possible side effects on their own websites. Even if you think the risk is small, you are still asking other people to take that risk with the most precious thing in their lives for YOU...would you use a driverless car if you had concerns if someone else demanded it? You and I both know that the negative stigma on vaccines has some merit and I don't think y'all are arrogant enough to dismiss thousands of parents who believed in vaccines and their children had side effects. Your postion I'm hoping is that you acknowledge the risks but you still think it is a good idea for the greater good. Even though I do not agree, it is a respectable position more-so than to dismiss all those parents, the gov't, and the drug companies own findings. Again, if people we being asked to give their kids an apple per day, then it would be more reasonable to dismiss any concerns. But I still would not want the gov't to force my child to eat apples; that is my decision.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sh00ter, post: 2757433, member: 24531"] LOL, he was probably threatened if that is the case...but if it is the case, I want to know more and the truth and I will look into it Rick. I would also remind you that snopes is run by a left-wing "crazy cat lady" and has been challenged for inserting their agenda into their opinions. The man & woman that own it are nobody...me and you could start a site like that and get people to use our information as fact. They have dispelled myths and I'm not saying everything they say is wrong. I thought of another analogy on the mandate of vaccines that might strike a nerve for people who are objectively trying to understand the for/against arguments. As you know driverless cars are on the rise and are being pushed by the progressive elite. Any bad or risk is ignored and we are told that they will make us all safer. At some point int he near future, there could be an argument for a mandate that you MUST use a computer-driven car and those who want to drive their own car are putting us all at risk. Nevermind those responsible drivers that have not hurt anyone, if they dare to want the freedom to travel as they see fit, they must be punished in some way. I suspect many people on this board who would support a vaccine mandate would be against a driverless car mandate...it is the same principle and I thought was a good way to help those who are trying to make up their mind on a vaccine mandate see this principle applied elsewhere. You can encourage and support vaccines without wanting to use the police state to force your fellow citizens into it. If it is such a good, safe thing, then it should stand on its own merit and not have to be forced. Dennis, Rick, what are your thoughts on this analogy? Vaccine do cause injury/reactions and the first step to showing you are intellectually honest is to acknowledge the gov't has paid out billions in damages, as well as the fact that the drug companies list possible side effects on their own websites. Even if you think the risk is small, you are still asking other people to take that risk with the most precious thing in their lives for YOU...would you use a driverless car if you had concerns if someone else demanded it? You and I both know that the negative stigma on vaccines has some merit and I don't think y'all are arrogant enough to dismiss thousands of parents who believed in vaccines and their children had side effects. Your postion I'm hoping is that you acknowledge the risks but you still think it is a good idea for the greater good. Even though I do not agree, it is a respectable position more-so than to dismiss all those parents, the gov't, and the drug companies own findings. Again, if people we being asked to give their kids an apple per day, then it would be more reasonable to dismiss any concerns. But I still would not want the gov't to force my child to eat apples; that is my decision. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OK Republican calling for forced vaccininations - as predicted
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom