Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Okla Homeowner Ends Criminals Crime Spree
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David2012" data-source="post: 1840677" data-attributes="member: 24428"><p>The two different scenerios doesn't matter one darn bit.. it is the precieved mindset that people believe about you.. and if you say [especially if you repeat it in many Internet forum chats] that you should 'shoot to kill' instead of 'shoot to stop' the threat... your likely gonna get procecuted for 1st or 2nd degree murder if the guy dies... even if it is inside your home! </p><p></p><p>The arguement would be made that you intended to kill the person, not to just defend yourself. That your past statements on the Internet showed your intent to kill someone if ever given the opportunity! The comment made above was to kill the guy so the tax payers wouldn't have to support him... not to defend themselves against serious injury or death... that would be considered murder....plain & simple.. no matter what the scenerio was. </p><p></p><p>1,000's of LEO agency's have armies of attorneys telling them to never say 'Shoot to kill' under any circumstances because of the liability issue.. and they have very deep pockets to defend themselves with in courts. Just how deep are your pockets? Are you really prepared to tell a jury that you were 'shooting to kill' someone who broke into your home?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David2012, post: 1840677, member: 24428"] The two different scenerios doesn't matter one darn bit.. it is the precieved mindset that people believe about you.. and if you say [especially if you repeat it in many Internet forum chats] that you should 'shoot to kill' instead of 'shoot to stop' the threat... your likely gonna get procecuted for 1st or 2nd degree murder if the guy dies... even if it is inside your home! The arguement would be made that you intended to kill the person, not to just defend yourself. That your past statements on the Internet showed your intent to kill someone if ever given the opportunity! The comment made above was to kill the guy so the tax payers wouldn't have to support him... not to defend themselves against serious injury or death... that would be considered murder....plain & simple.. no matter what the scenerio was. 1,000's of LEO agency's have armies of attorneys telling them to never say 'Shoot to kill' under any circumstances because of the liability issue.. and they have very deep pockets to defend themselves with in courts. Just how deep are your pockets? Are you really prepared to tell a jury that you were 'shooting to kill' someone who broke into your home? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Okla Homeowner Ends Criminals Crime Spree
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom