Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma Law Maker introduces 4 new Gun Bills
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decoligny" data-source="post: 2934335" data-attributes="member: 41077"><p>I really like the way you parse certain parts and disregard the rest.</p><p></p><p>You stated plainly that firearms could not be carried or loaded within city limits. PROVEN WRONG.</p><p>You were asked to find one single documented law from any city or town pre-1800s that state any such restrictions. If you had any reading comprehension ability, any such restrictions refers specifically to any law that backed up your assertion that "they were permitted, but not to be CARRIED or LOADED within city limits".</p><p></p><p>Your response was to post a law that prohibited them from being loaded inside buildings. TOTALLY DIFFERENT than not being allowed to be carried or loaded in city limits. CHALLANGE NOT MET AT ALL.</p><p></p><p>Unloading a flintlock pistol isn't a difficult thing. You remove the powder from the strike pan, unscrew the flint, take the ramrod and use the worm end (threaded point) to remove the lead ball, then dump the powder. Takes about a minute at most. Loading a flintlock is a fairly quick exercise also. Very easy to load it as you depart on your way, very easy to unload it when returning home. And they carried swords too because they only got one shot per gun.</p><p></p><p>The ratification dates were not pertinent to the challenge, just an interesting historical note.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decoligny, post: 2934335, member: 41077"] I really like the way you parse certain parts and disregard the rest. You stated plainly that firearms could not be carried or loaded within city limits. PROVEN WRONG. You were asked to find one single documented law from any city or town pre-1800s that state any such restrictions. If you had any reading comprehension ability, any such restrictions refers specifically to any law that backed up your assertion that "they were permitted, but not to be CARRIED or LOADED within city limits". Your response was to post a law that prohibited them from being loaded inside buildings. TOTALLY DIFFERENT than not being allowed to be carried or loaded in city limits. CHALLANGE NOT MET AT ALL. Unloading a flintlock pistol isn't a difficult thing. You remove the powder from the strike pan, unscrew the flint, take the ramrod and use the worm end (threaded point) to remove the lead ball, then dump the powder. Takes about a minute at most. Loading a flintlock is a fairly quick exercise also. Very easy to load it as you depart on your way, very easy to unload it when returning home. And they carried swords too because they only got one shot per gun. The ratification dates were not pertinent to the challenge, just an interesting historical note. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
oklahoma Law Maker introduces 4 new Gun Bills
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom