Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
One way to cut healthcare cost,
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aodh" data-source="post: 1567711" data-attributes="member: 9384"><p>I've just got to stick an oar in this debate. It apparently never crossed anyone's mind that when the Doc pointed out the facts of raising a "special needs" kid that the parents decided that the burden socially, mentally and physically on them made an abortion the best decision. I have never understood the argument that the fact the state's medical welfare agency would or would not pay for the procedure made the abortion decision any easier for the parent. I doubt that "Oh well, what the hell, its free. Lets do it!" is a big factor in the decision. </p><p></p><p>For the record, 9 years ago I worked for one of OK's largest private agencies that provided care for "moderately developmentally disabled adults", our clients were mostly Downes Syndrome adults in their 30's. The state at that time was paying us about $120 per resident, per day for those individuals staying in our nursing home, at that time the least expensive form of care provided. The individuals usually got into the system from their parents when Mom (usually the care provider) got too old and frail to handle the adult child. Our annual budget was about $25 million, virtually all derived from one federally funded program or another, and we were not nearly the largest agency handling DD adults. This shows that there is a significant taxpayer burden to these private decisions, beyond the cost of whether the government funds abortions or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aodh, post: 1567711, member: 9384"] I've just got to stick an oar in this debate. It apparently never crossed anyone's mind that when the Doc pointed out the facts of raising a "special needs" kid that the parents decided that the burden socially, mentally and physically on them made an abortion the best decision. I have never understood the argument that the fact the state's medical welfare agency would or would not pay for the procedure made the abortion decision any easier for the parent. I doubt that "Oh well, what the hell, its free. Lets do it!" is a big factor in the decision. For the record, 9 years ago I worked for one of OK's largest private agencies that provided care for "moderately developmentally disabled adults", our clients were mostly Downes Syndrome adults in their 30's. The state at that time was paying us about $120 per resident, per day for those individuals staying in our nursing home, at that time the least expensive form of care provided. The individuals usually got into the system from their parents when Mom (usually the care provider) got too old and frail to handle the adult child. Our annual budget was about $25 million, virtually all derived from one federally funded program or another, and we were not nearly the largest agency handling DD adults. This shows that there is a significant taxpayer burden to these private decisions, beyond the cost of whether the government funds abortions or not. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
One way to cut healthcare cost,
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom