Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Only YOU Can Protect Net Neutrality
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 2514218" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>so what in the world does what I posted have anything to do with what you wrote above? </p><p></p><p>costs are in the $Billions in terms of capital invested .. but revenues charged to subscribers are also in the $$$$ .. that's what's paying for all the capital expenditures. ISP's customers are already paying for bandwidth costs supported by those capital investments. due to amazing technologies advances in amounts of data each fiber is capable of carrying .. bandwidth costs have dropped to a fraction due to excess capacities of existing optic fibers. </p><p></p><p>yes data traffic has ramped up but technologies has ramped up accordingly .. multiplexing technologies makes it possible for exponential increases in amount of data being carried on the finite number of optic fibers. </p><p></p><p>ISP customers are already being charged for set performance standards rated in MB/Sec .. yet throttling most costs are getting to roll down to ISP customers yet again. those charges extorted from content providers will be passed on the consumers. </p><p></p><p>this is why the FCC should reclassify ISP as title 2 common carriers .. this would force ISP to allow equal access to everyone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 2514218, member: 7629"] so what in the world does what I posted have anything to do with what you wrote above? costs are in the $Billions in terms of capital invested .. but revenues charged to subscribers are also in the $$$$ .. that's what's paying for all the capital expenditures. ISP's customers are already paying for bandwidth costs supported by those capital investments. due to amazing technologies advances in amounts of data each fiber is capable of carrying .. bandwidth costs have dropped to a fraction due to excess capacities of existing optic fibers. yes data traffic has ramped up but technologies has ramped up accordingly .. multiplexing technologies makes it possible for exponential increases in amount of data being carried on the finite number of optic fibers. ISP customers are already being charged for set performance standards rated in MB/Sec .. yet throttling most costs are getting to roll down to ISP customers yet again. those charges extorted from content providers will be passed on the consumers. this is why the FCC should reclassify ISP as title 2 common carriers .. this would force ISP to allow equal access to everyone. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Only YOU Can Protect Net Neutrality
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom