Pelosi Violates The Constitution And Shows Her True Dictatorial Tyranny

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Pelosi dictates a rule that is unconstitutional, to wit: A violation of Article I Section 6, Clause 1.



https://www.theblaze.com/news/capit...utm_term=ACTIVE LIST - TheBlaze Breaking News
Sorry, Pelosi. Since when is a violation of a dictate from you amount to treason, a felony, or a breach of the peace?

Woody

 

[Okie4570]

When no body holds them accountable, when they're never investigated, when something pops up that doesn't favor them and the media suppresses it, this is what we get. Over and over and over, decade after decade.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Oops! It might not apply to members of Congress. I'll have to look into it further. Still, Pelosi is overreaching in my opinion.

Woody

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Oops! It might not apply to members of Congress. I'll have to look into it further. Still, Pelosi is overreaching in my opinion.

Woody

"The memo noted that the mask mandate applies to Congress members, but "officers should not arrest any Member for failure to wear a mask or to comply with the mask mandate." Instead, any lawmaker who "fails to comply with a request to wear a mask should be reported to the House Sergeant at Arms' office."

Why report them to the House Sargent at Arms? I would consider that a harassment and no less a violation of Article I Section 6, Clause 1. It is obviously meant to intimidate, show disrespect, and unless the House votes to adopt such a mask mandate - or any other mandate for that matter - would violate Article I, Section 5, Clause 2. As much as she wants to be a dictator, she has not conquered this nation nor been granted any such power.

Woody

 

[SoonerP226]

Why report them to the House Sargent at Arms?

Probably because the Sergeant at Arms is charged with enforcing the rules of the House.

ETA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergeant_at_Arms_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

 

[L.C.]

Just showing her true colors as always

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Probably because the Sergeant at Arms is charged with enforcing the rules of the House.

ETA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergeant_at_Arms_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

What rule gives her the power to dictate such a mandate? Did the House vote on such a mandate? Did the House vote to give her the power to act autonomously? I haven't heard.

Woody

 

[okcBob]

Hopefully the left has overplayed their hand & will lose the House next year.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Looks like Der Fuhrer Biden is joining in with the dictates as well.:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/presi...ederal-workers-must-submit-to-vaccine-testing
I guess we ought to just fall in line just like all peoples who have been conquered. We are being ruled in that fashion, aren't we?

Woody

 

[SoonerP226]

What rule gives her the power to dictate such a mandate? Did the House vote on such a mandate? Did the House vote to give her the power to act autonomously? I haven't heard.

Woody

I don't know. I'm just answering the question about why they'd be referred to the Sergeant at Arms.