Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Pistol Brace "rules" signed by AG today
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sklfco" data-source="post: 3955069" data-attributes="member: 24908"><p>You can read about how the NRA has been fighting the second amendment since about 1934 <a href="https://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/gunstuff/legal/KABA-1934_NFA_hearings.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/gunstuff/legal/KABA-1934_NFA_hearings.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>Here is an excerpt from there</p><p></p><p>NRA President Frederick's testimony began by explaining that he had "been giving this subject of firearms regulations study and consideration over a period of 15 years" and that "the suggestions resulting from that study of mine...have resulted in the adoption in many States of regulatory provisions suggested by us." He later described his active role in helping pass D.C.'s then-recent, ultra-stringent gun controls. Having helped enact gun control legislation was a matter of pride for NRA's president -- as you shall see below. The D.C. gun controls of which he candidly boasted included the following provisions, among others:</p><p>• prohibited carrying a concealed pistol without a license -- with an exemption, of course, for law enforcement officers</p><p>• justification for getting licensed to carry a firearm if "applicant has good reason to fear injury to</p><p> 1 of 71</p><p>10/15/2018 06:08 PM</p><p>1934 NFA HEARINGS <a href="http://www.keepandbeararms.com/NRA/NFA.htm" target="_blank">1934 NFA HEARINGS</a></p><p>his person or property" -- and the license application process included a mugshot, treating lawful</p><p>gun owners like common criminals</p><p>• a two-day waiting period to purchase a handgun -- with an exemption, of course, for law enforcement officers -- even though violent stalkers don't tend to wait to attack</p><p>• required thorough record-keeping by gun dealers, of all transactions and every buyer</p><p>• required that the seller deliver all of a buyer's personal information to the police within hours of the transaction, including the make, model and serial number of the firearm</p><p>• mandated that gun dealers be licensed at the discretion of the police</p><p>• banned altering firearms' serial numbers or other identifying marks</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is not the actions of an organization worth keeping around, unless your one of waynes pals profiting off of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sklfco, post: 3955069, member: 24908"] You can read about how the NRA has been fighting the second amendment since about 1934 [URL]https://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/gunstuff/legal/KABA-1934_NFA_hearings.pdf[/URL] Here is an excerpt from there NRA President Frederick's testimony began by explaining that he had "been giving this subject of firearms regulations study and consideration over a period of 15 years" and that "the suggestions resulting from that study of mine...have resulted in the adoption in many States of regulatory provisions suggested by us." He later described his active role in helping pass D.C.'s then-recent, ultra-stringent gun controls. Having helped enact gun control legislation was a matter of pride for NRA's president -- as you shall see below. The D.C. gun controls of which he candidly boasted included the following provisions, among others: • prohibited carrying a concealed pistol without a license -- with an exemption, of course, for law enforcement officers • justification for getting licensed to carry a firearm if "applicant has good reason to fear injury to 1 of 71 10/15/2018 06:08 PM 1934 NFA HEARINGS [URL="http://www.keepandbeararms.com/NRA/NFA.htm"]1934 NFA HEARINGS[/URL] his person or property" -- and the license application process included a mugshot, treating lawful gun owners like common criminals • a two-day waiting period to purchase a handgun -- with an exemption, of course, for law enforcement officers -- even though violent stalkers don't tend to wait to attack • required thorough record-keeping by gun dealers, of all transactions and every buyer • required that the seller deliver all of a buyer's personal information to the police within hours of the transaction, including the make, model and serial number of the firearm • mandated that gun dealers be licensed at the discretion of the police • banned altering firearms' serial numbers or other identifying marks This is not the actions of an organization worth keeping around, unless your one of waynes pals profiting off of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Pistol Brace "rules" signed by AG today
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom