Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Pistol Brace "rules" signed by AG today
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mightymouse" data-source="post: 3969829" data-attributes="member: 15253"><p>Those "two major retailers" <em>attended</em> an ATF seminar <em>online</em> (let's call it a "webinar"). There was a morning and an afternoon webinar both Tues (Jan 31) and Weds (Feb 1), for a total of four. Any FFL could have watched any one or all of them. Same 30-40 minute PowerPoint presentation for all four webinars. Each presentation was followed by a Q&A session which lasted between 35-50 minutes for the two afternoon webinars I watched (I did not get a chance to see either of the morning sessions). </p><p></p><p>Questions were submitted to the ATF during the presentation, the questions were correlated, and the most common ones were answered. Someone read the questions, a panel from the ATF answered them. (I should add that the Q&A sessions were audio only--no video.) With four Q&A sessions, it is easy to see how the two retailers might have gotten two different answers. And, if you're like me, I found myself jotting down notes about the answer to the previous question while the next question was being asked. Some of those Q&A's were fired off in rapid fashion, and you had to be listening closely (not always possible depending on the circumstances surrounding your environment--like in a active retail sales establishment). And that is as accurate and concise as I can make my useless speculation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mightymouse, post: 3969829, member: 15253"] Those "two major retailers" [I]attended[/I] an ATF seminar [I]online[/I] (let's call it a "webinar"). There was a morning and an afternoon webinar both Tues (Jan 31) and Weds (Feb 1), for a total of four. Any FFL could have watched any one or all of them. Same 30-40 minute PowerPoint presentation for all four webinars. Each presentation was followed by a Q&A session which lasted between 35-50 minutes for the two afternoon webinars I watched (I did not get a chance to see either of the morning sessions). Questions were submitted to the ATF during the presentation, the questions were correlated, and the most common ones were answered. Someone read the questions, a panel from the ATF answered them. (I should add that the Q&A sessions were audio only--no video.) With four Q&A sessions, it is easy to see how the two retailers might have gotten two different answers. And, if you're like me, I found myself jotting down notes about the answer to the previous question while the next question was being asked. Some of those Q&A's were fired off in rapid fashion, and you had to be listening closely (not always possible depending on the circumstances surrounding your environment--like in a active retail sales establishment). And that is as accurate and concise as I can make my useless speculation. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Pistol Brace "rules" signed by AG today
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom