Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Places that are off limits for CCW?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1449608" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>That statute does not modify 21 O.S 1272, which was what <em>Pierce</em> interpreted. Furthermore, the <em>Pierce</em> ruling was most recently affirmed in <em>Gilio v. State</em> in 2001, post-SDA.</p><p></p><p>From <em>Gilio</em>:</p><p></p><p>"¶11 The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in Pierce v. State, 1929 OK CR 42, ¶ __, 275 P. 393, 394, interpreting the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions, held:</p><p></p><p>There is but one question raised in the brief of the defendant, and that question is whether or not, under the Constitution and laws of the state [sic] of Oklahoma, the defendant had a right to carry a gun on his person while in his own house and yard.</p><p></p><p>The Court settled the issue by stating:</p><p></p><p>As the law now is in this state, a person may lawfully own and possess any of the weapons named in sections 1991, 1992, [pistols and revolvers] and may move such weapons from room to room in their place of residence, but may not wear them on their person and transport them about the yard as shown by the evidence to have been done by the defendant in this case.</p><p></p><p>Id. at ¶ __, 275 P.2d at 395."</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, it was held in <em>Shepherd v. State</em> that self-defense against a known threatened attack is not a sufficient defense against unlawful carry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1449608, member: 5151"] That statute does not modify 21 O.S 1272, which was what [I]Pierce[/I] interpreted. Furthermore, the [I]Pierce[/I] ruling was most recently affirmed in [I]Gilio v. State[/I] in 2001, post-SDA. From [I]Gilio[/I]: "¶11 The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in Pierce v. State, 1929 OK CR 42, ¶ __, 275 P. 393, 394, interpreting the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions, held: There is but one question raised in the brief of the defendant, and that question is whether or not, under the Constitution and laws of the state [sic] of Oklahoma, the defendant had a right to carry a gun on his person while in his own house and yard. The Court settled the issue by stating: As the law now is in this state, a person may lawfully own and possess any of the weapons named in sections 1991, 1992, [pistols and revolvers] and may move such weapons from room to room in their place of residence, but may not wear them on their person and transport them about the yard as shown by the evidence to have been done by the defendant in this case. Id. at ¶ __, 275 P.2d at 395." Furthermore, it was held in [I]Shepherd v. State[/I] that self-defense against a known threatened attack is not a sufficient defense against unlawful carry. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Places that are off limits for CCW?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom