Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
planned parenthood not indicted by grand jury
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 2841210" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>Daleiden and Merritt are both named in a <a href="http://ppfa.pr-optout.com/ViewAttachment.aspx?EID=mr9WXYw4u2IxYnni1dBRVsyFeJIuuWQv%2btbEt05Givo%3d" target="_blank">federal lawsuit </a>filed earlier this month by Planned Parenthood.</p><p></p><p>========</p><p></p><p></p><p>5.</p><p>Defendants’ conspiracy focused on Planned Parenthood affiliates’ facilitation of</p><p>fetal tissue donation. As part of this conspiracy, Defendants set up a fake company called Biomax</p><p>Procurement Services, LLC (“BIOMAX”), which dishonestly held itself out as a legitimate fetal</p><p>tissue procurement company. Certain individual Defendants pretended to be officers and</p><p>employees of BIOMAX. They created pseudonyms, manufactured fake identification, stole one</p><p>woman’s identity, and used a credit card with a fake name. Defendants used those fake corporate</p><p>and personal identities to gain access to private conferences including those held by Planned</p><p>Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation (“NAF”). To secure admission into these</p><p>conferences, Defendants and their agents signed binding agreements making promises they had no</p><p>intention of keeping. Once admitted, Defendants wore hidden video cameras and secretly taped</p><p>hundreds of hours of conversations with Plaintiffs’ staff.</p><p></p><p>~</p><p></p><p>JURISDICTION AND VENUE</p><p>12.</p><p>This action arises under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,</p><p>18 U.S.C. § 1964, 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (fraud and related activity in connection with identification</p><p>documents), 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud) & § 1343 (wire fraud), 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (interception</p><p>and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications), as well as various state laws. This</p><p>Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 2201, and</p><p>2202. This Court also has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (supplemental</p><p>jurisdiction).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 2841210, member: 7629"] Daleiden and Merritt are both named in a [URL="http://ppfa.pr-optout.com/ViewAttachment.aspx?EID=mr9WXYw4u2IxYnni1dBRVsyFeJIuuWQv%2btbEt05Givo%3d"]federal lawsuit [/URL]filed earlier this month by Planned Parenthood. ======== 5. Defendants’ conspiracy focused on Planned Parenthood affiliates’ facilitation of fetal tissue donation. As part of this conspiracy, Defendants set up a fake company called Biomax Procurement Services, LLC (“BIOMAX”), which dishonestly held itself out as a legitimate fetal tissue procurement company. Certain individual Defendants pretended to be officers and employees of BIOMAX. They created pseudonyms, manufactured fake identification, stole one woman’s identity, and used a credit card with a fake name. Defendants used those fake corporate and personal identities to gain access to private conferences including those held by Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation (“NAF”). To secure admission into these conferences, Defendants and their agents signed binding agreements making promises they had no intention of keeping. Once admitted, Defendants wore hidden video cameras and secretly taped hundreds of hours of conversations with Plaintiffs’ staff. ~ JURISDICTION AND VENUE 12. This action arises under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1964, 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud) & § 1343 (wire fraud), 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications), as well as various state laws. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 2201, and 2202. This Court also has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
planned parenthood not indicted by grand jury
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom