Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Point don't shoot bill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 2984209" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>Makes no sense...because that is nothing close to what I said.</p><p></p><p>There is a world of difference, and reaction time, in between drawing to fire and drawing to point your gun and "see what happens next".</p><p></p><p>If you need to fire your gun, why on earth would you pause to wait and see what your attacker is going to do at the end of your draw stroke?</p><p></p><p>If by some miracle both you and your attacker have fast enough reactions times to OODA Loop the **** out of a smooth fast draw and fire sequence and he gives up before your trigger breaks then by all means you wouldn't/shouldn't go ahead and shoot....and no DA would charge you if you could reasonably articulate the need to inject deadly force up until you ceased the effort.</p><p></p><p>Nobody has ever been charged in such a situation as far as I know, and a law like this just adds to an already ridiculous patch work of self defense laws.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 2984209, member: 42"] Makes no sense...because that is nothing close to what I said. There is a world of difference, and reaction time, in between drawing to fire and drawing to point your gun and "see what happens next". If you need to fire your gun, why on earth would you pause to wait and see what your attacker is going to do at the end of your draw stroke? If by some miracle both you and your attacker have fast enough reactions times to OODA Loop the **** out of a smooth fast draw and fire sequence and he gives up before your trigger breaks then by all means you wouldn't/shouldn't go ahead and shoot....and no DA would charge you if you could reasonably articulate the need to inject deadly force up until you ceased the effort. Nobody has ever been charged in such a situation as far as I know, and a law like this just adds to an already ridiculous patch work of self defense laws. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Point don't shoot bill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom