Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Politics, Politicians, the State Legislature and this board.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMFIC" data-source="post: 1511837" data-attributes="member: 7539"><p>JDA,</p><p></p><p>Are you simply trying to say that in order to move the yardsticks, we should set our goal at only gaining one yard?</p><p></p><p>I'm sure it's realistic in the legislature to try and make compromises in order to make gains, but clearly if you don't begin from a position worthy of throwing the ball in the first place, then you'll lose possession every time.</p><p></p><p>I'm just simply shocked that you would even attempt to ask those who have strong convictions in the freedoms they believe the 2nd amendment provides them to negotiate towards the middle in order to appease those who have the 100% opposite view. I'd like to see your effort in convicing go towards those who are undecided or don't seem to care. What would you tell them?</p><p></p><p>Wasn't our country founded on strong convictions and those who were willing to fight and die to stand up for them? I don't remember George Washington taking a deal for land and title and selling us all down the river such as you might propose.</p><p></p><p>Just in case you haven't done your homework... we're right up there with New York & Illinois for being non-permisive in open carry. EVEN CALIFORNIA has a rural open carry law!</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]89757[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMFIC, post: 1511837, member: 7539"] JDA, Are you simply trying to say that in order to move the yardsticks, we should set our goal at only gaining one yard? I'm sure it's realistic in the legislature to try and make compromises in order to make gains, but clearly if you don't begin from a position worthy of throwing the ball in the first place, then you'll lose possession every time. I'm just simply shocked that you would even attempt to ask those who have strong convictions in the freedoms they believe the 2nd amendment provides them to negotiate towards the middle in order to appease those who have the 100% opposite view. I'd like to see your effort in convicing go towards those who are undecided or don't seem to care. What would you tell them? Wasn't our country founded on strong convictions and those who were willing to fight and die to stand up for them? I don't remember George Washington taking a deal for land and title and selling us all down the river such as you might propose. Just in case you haven't done your homework... we're right up there with New York & Illinois for being non-permisive in open carry. EVEN CALIFORNIA has a rural open carry law! [attach=full]89757[/attach] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Politics, Politicians, the State Legislature and this board.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom