Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigcountryok" data-source="post: 878064" data-attributes="member: 4368"><p>No, that would be unethical utilizing the cover of darkness and a blinding light that reduces the opportunity for escape in many cases.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Only because it's not legalized yet and has not been an accepted practice for the past 70 years in the US. </p><p></p><p>How does another person's use of a supressor constitute unethical hunting and infringe on your rigths? There is still a loud crack to alert the game, the muzzel blast is just not as extreme right next to the hunter.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Regardless, its still one less freedom that we have because of the mind set of people that work for us that think supressors are evil. Why not at least bring it up. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thats fine, because you are not forced to head out to the woods with a supressor. In the eyes of those ignorant about nature hunting ,regardless of method, is not so funny. They are completly ignorant about the need for hunting and conservation. How is the use of a supressor going to change anything in that concern. </p><p></p><p>Honestly I really doubt that very few would take advantage of it because of the expense. Regardless there is no reason for it not to be allowed. It's just one right that has been taken away from us out of ignorance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigcountryok, post: 878064, member: 4368"] No, that would be unethical utilizing the cover of darkness and a blinding light that reduces the opportunity for escape in many cases. Only because it's not legalized yet and has not been an accepted practice for the past 70 years in the US. How does another person's use of a supressor constitute unethical hunting and infringe on your rigths? There is still a loud crack to alert the game, the muzzel blast is just not as extreme right next to the hunter. Regardless, its still one less freedom that we have because of the mind set of people that work for us that think supressors are evil. Why not at least bring it up. Thats fine, because you are not forced to head out to the woods with a supressor. In the eyes of those ignorant about nature hunting ,regardless of method, is not so funny. They are completly ignorant about the need for hunting and conservation. How is the use of a supressor going to change anything in that concern. Honestly I really doubt that very few would take advantage of it because of the expense. Regardless there is no reason for it not to be allowed. It's just one right that has been taken away from us out of ignorance. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom