Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 893960" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>I will never understand the poaching argument - if the suppressor is legal in the first place, then sure - I'm totally going to spend $200 for my stamp, subject myself to an auditing process with the BATFE, and then use it to poach deer????</p><p></p><p>Safety of others is only a concern if I'm using sub-sonic ammo and I honestly can't see any reason to use sub-sonic ammo - but even if I did - hearing a shot is hardly going to do me any good if the bullet is traveling faster than the speed of sound - I guess a super-sonic near miss would be counted as a warning and I would hit the dirt, but a bullet traveling through the woods is going to make some noise as it passes by hitting brush/trees, etc... </p><p></p><p>There is just no logical reason to ban Silencers for any rifle-hunting that I can see.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 893960, member: 229"] I will never understand the poaching argument - if the suppressor is legal in the first place, then sure - I'm totally going to spend $200 for my stamp, subject myself to an auditing process with the BATFE, and then use it to poach deer???? Safety of others is only a concern if I'm using sub-sonic ammo and I honestly can't see any reason to use sub-sonic ammo - but even if I did - hearing a shot is hardly going to do me any good if the bullet is traveling faster than the speed of sound - I guess a super-sonic near miss would be counted as a warning and I would hit the dirt, but a bullet traveling through the woods is going to make some noise as it passes by hitting brush/trees, etc... There is just no logical reason to ban Silencers for any rifle-hunting that I can see. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Poll about allowing suppressors for hunting purposes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom