Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Poll: Should the NFA be Repealed?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="de-evoproject" data-source="post: 1289283" data-attributes="member: 14169"><p>Werewolf, dude, i fully appreciate your response, it was very intelligently put together and not just some keyboard warrior put down on my opinion. Thank you. Seriously. Maybe you will be one of the guys that can look at what i'm about to say and not immediately trash me for having an opinion.</p><p></p><p>I never said that i SUPPORT the current regulations and restrictions. What i was trying to say is i have no problem with having to register silencers and full autos and have a background check to buy them. Sure it won't keep the real bad people from getting them if they want them but it won't make it easier either. And a small $20 dollar processing fee to pay the ATF person on the phone running your check is not unreasonable. Definitely better than a $200 dollar stamp. </p><p></p><p>I mean really how intrusive would a simple background check (like you already have to do to buy most firearms) and registration with a nominal processing fee be? You already do the registration and fee with your vehicles right? And we all do a background check to buy guns right?</p><p></p><p>I don't support the fact that i have to get a signature from my local CLEO. Its too arbitrary. They could say no simply bc of how you look. At least with the ATF its based off of facts they pull on your background not, "Hmmm.. Looks like a troublemaker." And $200 tax stamp is pretty outrageous.</p><p></p><p>And i have to respectfully disagree about the morality and responsibility issue. If they weren't in place to govern that, we wouldn't have any laws at all. That's what laws do, put in a system to keep people moral and hold them responsible for their actions.</p><p></p><p>And at the car muffler comment, I'm sorry but that is just a horrible analogy. I've never seen the purpose of a car muffler being to point your car exhaust at a person to kill them without being easily detected. Its like comparing a cigarette lighter to a flamethrower or incendiary bomb. Just because they do roughly the same job does not mean they are even close to being in the same category or should be governed by the same rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="de-evoproject, post: 1289283, member: 14169"] Werewolf, dude, i fully appreciate your response, it was very intelligently put together and not just some keyboard warrior put down on my opinion. Thank you. Seriously. Maybe you will be one of the guys that can look at what i'm about to say and not immediately trash me for having an opinion. I never said that i SUPPORT the current regulations and restrictions. What i was trying to say is i have no problem with having to register silencers and full autos and have a background check to buy them. Sure it won't keep the real bad people from getting them if they want them but it won't make it easier either. And a small $20 dollar processing fee to pay the ATF person on the phone running your check is not unreasonable. Definitely better than a $200 dollar stamp. I mean really how intrusive would a simple background check (like you already have to do to buy most firearms) and registration with a nominal processing fee be? You already do the registration and fee with your vehicles right? And we all do a background check to buy guns right? I don't support the fact that i have to get a signature from my local CLEO. Its too arbitrary. They could say no simply bc of how you look. At least with the ATF its based off of facts they pull on your background not, "Hmmm.. Looks like a troublemaker." And $200 tax stamp is pretty outrageous. And i have to respectfully disagree about the morality and responsibility issue. If they weren't in place to govern that, we wouldn't have any laws at all. That's what laws do, put in a system to keep people moral and hold them responsible for their actions. And at the car muffler comment, I'm sorry but that is just a horrible analogy. I've never seen the purpose of a car muffler being to point your car exhaust at a person to kill them without being easily detected. Its like comparing a cigarette lighter to a flamethrower or incendiary bomb. Just because they do roughly the same job does not mean they are even close to being in the same category or should be governed by the same rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Poll: Should the NFA be Repealed?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom