Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Potus will speak
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ace_on_the_Turn" data-source="post: 2821413" data-attributes="member: 27417"><p>A republican lead congressional committee report on the Benghazi attack finds no there was, "no intelligence failure prior to the attack, no stand-down order to CIA operatives trying to go assist at the besieged consular building and found conflicting intelligence in the wake of the attack about the motive and cause, which were reflected in early public comments by the administration" and you dismiss it out of hand. </p><p></p><p>A democratic congressman says there are, "72 employees at the Department of Homeland Security are listed on the U.S. terrorist watch list" you take it as gospel.</p><p></p><p>It's almost like you pick and choose (according to what fits your narrative) what to believe. </p><p></p><p>Today's assignment: Look up "confirmation bias".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ace_on_the_Turn, post: 2821413, member: 27417"] A republican lead congressional committee report on the Benghazi attack finds no there was, "no intelligence failure prior to the attack, no stand-down order to CIA operatives trying to go assist at the besieged consular building and found conflicting intelligence in the wake of the attack about the motive and cause, which were reflected in early public comments by the administration" and you dismiss it out of hand. A democratic congressman says there are, "72 employees at the Department of Homeland Security are listed on the U.S. terrorist watch list" you take it as gospel. It's almost like you pick and choose (according to what fits your narrative) what to believe. Today's assignment: Look up "confirmation bias". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Potus will speak
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom