Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
press conference
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Murph" data-source="post: 2086576" data-attributes="member: 8602"><p>These are just <strong>my</strong> thoughts about what these EO's could be used for. IANAL</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think these are an effort to do an end run on the Tiahrt Amendment</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This will probably give the CDC official standing to regulate firearms on health issues. Also these will change the rules about who is mentally unfit to own a firearm. Expect to see the unfit criteria to be expanded, and the reporting agency rules eased. Remember the 2nd Amendment only protects hunters and sane people.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This will probably give the CPSC standing to regulate firearms. I expect this will also broaden the criteria in judging if a gun accident was negligent, and expanding the punishment if so. This will also require additional 'safety devices' that not only raise prices, but will literally break usability, rendering a gun inoperable and useless.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah that's the problem, we don't have a director for the ATF. What happened to the last one? Wasn't he caught up in the 'Fast and Furious' debacle? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is more of the same old BS, Oh boy look!!! He is going to launch, provide, maximize, and develop, all this really super intelligent stuff. Our problems are over.</p><p></p><p>Now then let us engage in vehement and angry quarrels over just how stupid we each are for disagreeing with each other and let this administration get back to what it does best...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Murph, post: 2086576, member: 8602"] These are just [B]my[/B] thoughts about what these EO's could be used for. IANAL I think these are an effort to do an end run on the Tiahrt Amendment This will probably give the CDC official standing to regulate firearms on health issues. Also these will change the rules about who is mentally unfit to own a firearm. Expect to see the unfit criteria to be expanded, and the reporting agency rules eased. Remember the 2nd Amendment only protects hunters and sane people. This will probably give the CPSC standing to regulate firearms. I expect this will also broaden the criteria in judging if a gun accident was negligent, and expanding the punishment if so. This will also require additional 'safety devices' that not only raise prices, but will literally break usability, rendering a gun inoperable and useless. Yeah that's the problem, we don't have a director for the ATF. What happened to the last one? Wasn't he caught up in the 'Fast and Furious' debacle? This is more of the same old BS, Oh boy look!!! He is going to launch, provide, maximize, and develop, all this really super intelligent stuff. Our problems are over. Now then let us engage in vehement and angry quarrels over just how stupid we each are for disagreeing with each other and let this administration get back to what it does best... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
press conference
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom