Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Pretty dumb/stupid/ignorant/idiotic EVEN for the Obama Administration
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ace_on_the_Turn" data-source="post: 2818968" data-attributes="member: 27417"><p>Michael Morell has been out of the loop for 2 and half years. There may very well be intelligence he's not aware of for not hitting the fields directly. But, even if what he says is 100% correct, "We didn't go after oil wells, actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls, because we didn't want to do environmental damage, and we didn't want to<strong> destroy that infrastructure</strong>," Morell told PBS' "Charlie Rose" Tuesday evening, reported The Daily Caller. Morell explained that the White House was also concerned that<strong> destroying the oil infrastructure could be detrimental to the Syrian people in the long run</strong> once ISIS is defeated." You are ignoring the bolded part. So, it's not just out of concern for the environmental impact. But, as in the past, don't let the facts get in the way. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, we are not. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Is that from the Redundancy Department of Redundancy? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Is that opposed to beheading without killing?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, according to his tax records Obama is personally funding ISIS, and has the damn nerve to try and claim it on taxes. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really clear of process of impeachment? And if we didn't impeach Bush after he started a war based on, let's be kind and say bad information, that ended with the deaths of thousands of U.S. troops, it would be pretty hard to justify impeaching Obama, wouldn't you say?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ace_on_the_Turn, post: 2818968, member: 27417"] Michael Morell has been out of the loop for 2 and half years. There may very well be intelligence he's not aware of for not hitting the fields directly. But, even if what he says is 100% correct, "We didn't go after oil wells, actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls, because we didn't want to do environmental damage, and we didn't want to[B] destroy that infrastructure[/B]," Morell told PBS' "Charlie Rose" Tuesday evening, reported The Daily Caller. Morell explained that the White House was also concerned that[B] destroying the oil infrastructure could be detrimental to the Syrian people in the long run[/B] once ISIS is defeated." You are ignoring the bolded part. So, it's not just out of concern for the environmental impact. But, as in the past, don't let the facts get in the way. No, we are not. Is that from the Redundancy Department of Redundancy? Is that opposed to beheading without killing? Yeah, according to his tax records Obama is personally funding ISIS, and has the damn nerve to try and claim it on taxes. Not really clear of process of impeachment? And if we didn't impeach Bush after he started a war based on, let's be kind and say bad information, that ended with the deaths of thousands of U.S. troops, it would be pretty hard to justify impeaching Obama, wouldn't you say? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Pretty dumb/stupid/ignorant/idiotic EVEN for the Obama Administration
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom