Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Pro-2A Parkland survivor Kyle Kashuv questioned by school security for visiting gun range with his f
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3108380" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>No, their intentions have no bearing on the law. Under the conditions described, and absent an immunity deal (which would require coordination with the DA’s office and preclude any rush to obtain his statement to the exclusion of his parents), his right to remain silent is unassailable. When a sworn officer conducts an interview, it is to support enforcement of criminal law. That is literally their function. They may conclude that no law was broken, but that doesn’t invalidate a subject’s 5th Amendment rights.</p><p></p><p>And yes I misspoke when I said their 5th Amendment rights are inviolate. If an officer of the court enters into an immunity from prosecution agreement with the subject, they may be compelled to provide a statement. Otherwise, no.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3108380, member: 1132"] No, their intentions have no bearing on the law. Under the conditions described, and absent an immunity deal (which would require coordination with the DA’s office and preclude any rush to obtain his statement to the exclusion of his parents), his right to remain silent is unassailable. When a sworn officer conducts an interview, it is to support enforcement of criminal law. That is literally their function. They may conclude that no law was broken, but that doesn’t invalidate a subject’s 5th Amendment rights. And yes I misspoke when I said their 5th Amendment rights are inviolate. If an officer of the court enters into an immunity from prosecution agreement with the subject, they may be compelled to provide a statement. Otherwise, no. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Pro-2A Parkland survivor Kyle Kashuv questioned by school security for visiting gun range with his f
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom