Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Pruitt: Scientists receiving federal grants will be cut from EPA advising roles
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="C_Hallbert" data-source="post: 3044831" data-attributes="member: 42957"><p>Thanks for posting this. For YEARS these ‘Guns for Hire’ so-called Scientists have been pumping out questionable or fictitious Reports based on Studies that they are shaped to fit the desired (or convenient) results desired by the Politically Biased Agencies or Special Interest Groups that fund them. Studies on Global Warming, Fracking, Gun Deaths, etc are all suspect. They blend enough truth in their interpretations to make them plausible. A PhD. Marine Biologist who frequently worked on Environmental Impact Studies (brother of a girl I used to know) told me, “We can make a Report say whatever the client wants.”; and “When there are problems with data not leading to the desired conclusion, we can ‘make up’ words.” He said that he hated the people who owned the laboratory where he worked. Unfortunately, this kind corrupt science is profitable. It also makes a person wonder about things like DNA (for instance) in High Profile Trials. Anyway,the Trump Administration my be controversial, but they are trying (at least) to put an end to these kinds of expensive, parasitic relationships that the government has engendered. I’m afraid that his opposition will hire out to obtain a report with ‘Conclusive Evidence’ that the President is incompetent. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="C_Hallbert, post: 3044831, member: 42957"] Thanks for posting this. For YEARS these ‘Guns for Hire’ so-called Scientists have been pumping out questionable or fictitious Reports based on Studies that they are shaped to fit the desired (or convenient) results desired by the Politically Biased Agencies or Special Interest Groups that fund them. Studies on Global Warming, Fracking, Gun Deaths, etc are all suspect. They blend enough truth in their interpretations to make them plausible. A PhD. Marine Biologist who frequently worked on Environmental Impact Studies (brother of a girl I used to know) told me, “We can make a Report say whatever the client wants.”; and “When there are problems with data not leading to the desired conclusion, we can ‘make up’ words.” He said that he hated the people who owned the laboratory where he worked. Unfortunately, this kind corrupt science is profitable. It also makes a person wonder about things like DNA (for instance) in High Profile Trials. Anyway,the Trump Administration my be controversial, but they are trying (at least) to put an end to these kinds of expensive, parasitic relationships that the government has engendered. I’m afraid that his opposition will hire out to obtain a report with ‘Conclusive Evidence’ that the President is incompetent. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Pruitt: Scientists receiving federal grants will be cut from EPA advising roles
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom