Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Ram's new EcoDiesel
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2400393" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>Lots of truth to these. I knew all of this but didn't really realize how much damage to the positives the EPA has done it until these posts. </p><p></p><p>Another problem is the ULSD and it's lack of lubricity compared to the old stuff. The greenies just can't help themselves, with the old diesels and real fuel you had 40% less fuel consumption compared to gas in an engine of the same displacement. I don't care what the data shows, if you are burning 40% less fuel the overall volume pollutants have to be less. No way to argue that. Just think of what it could be today with the technology we have. Farmer you are right about Europe, and it's been that way for years. Japan too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2400393, member: 3099"] Lots of truth to these. I knew all of this but didn't really realize how much damage to the positives the EPA has done it until these posts. Another problem is the ULSD and it's lack of lubricity compared to the old stuff. The greenies just can't help themselves, with the old diesels and real fuel you had 40% less fuel consumption compared to gas in an engine of the same displacement. I don't care what the data shows, if you are burning 40% less fuel the overall volume pollutants have to be less. No way to argue that. Just think of what it could be today with the technology we have. Farmer you are right about Europe, and it's been that way for years. Japan too. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Ram's new EcoDiesel
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom