Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Randy Brogdon Challenging Mary Fallin
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 2370714" data-attributes="member: 24531"><p>perhaps you are right.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Interesting he takes opposing views...at least he thinks for himself and examines each issue instead of a Carl Rove agenda.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where are all the health bashers when I need them...? If it were me preaching about toxins then they'd pile on LOL...again, I am militantly against 2nd-hand smoke...I darn near consider it a violent assault on my body due to a lung condition that amplifies it's harmful effects...you don't need to tell me about that. But FINALLY, technology has caught up enough that smokers have another choice that doesn't hurt other people and the fundamentalists have to block it...I'm not saying I want people smoking e-cigs...I'm saying i want them smoking e-cigs instead of regular cigs if they choose to smoke...why would anyone want to discourage that...A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT HOW THEY HURT THE PERSON SMOKING THEM is totally appropriate...tell people the information and let them decide...banning stuff mainly needs to be done when it hurts other people.</p><p></p><p>I am not disagreeing with you one way or the other about your studies...I am sticking to principles and common sense and my own logic. I do not smoke and I never have...if someone can't have access to e-cigs, it doesn't affect me too much. But I think that supposed freedom-loving republicans like Fallin show their true colors when they BAN stuff to protect people from themselves. That is Mayor Bloomberg man!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sh00ter, post: 2370714, member: 24531"] perhaps you are right. Interesting he takes opposing views...at least he thinks for himself and examines each issue instead of a Carl Rove agenda. Where are all the health bashers when I need them...? If it were me preaching about toxins then they'd pile on LOL...again, I am militantly against 2nd-hand smoke...I darn near consider it a violent assault on my body due to a lung condition that amplifies it's harmful effects...you don't need to tell me about that. But FINALLY, technology has caught up enough that smokers have another choice that doesn't hurt other people and the fundamentalists have to block it...I'm not saying I want people smoking e-cigs...I'm saying i want them smoking e-cigs instead of regular cigs if they choose to smoke...why would anyone want to discourage that...A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT HOW THEY HURT THE PERSON SMOKING THEM is totally appropriate...tell people the information and let them decide...banning stuff mainly needs to be done when it hurts other people. I am not disagreeing with you one way or the other about your studies...I am sticking to principles and common sense and my own logic. I do not smoke and I never have...if someone can't have access to e-cigs, it doesn't affect me too much. But I think that supposed freedom-loving republicans like Fallin show their true colors when they BAN stuff to protect people from themselves. That is Mayor Bloomberg man! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Randy Brogdon Challenging Mary Fallin
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom