Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Real reason Wal-Mart closed stores
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2736910" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>They can't just fire them without some just cause. The unemployment 'insurance' they will have to pay for a store full of employees would max out their rate.</p><p></p><p>Besides, it was stated that the problem was theft. Employee pilfering is cause enough to fire them without running the risk of an increase in unemployment insurance. Someone fired for a just cause cannot collect unemployment compensation. So, we're back to shoplifting and loss prevention officers. Also note that a certain amount of loss due to theft is built into the price of everything that is sold in stores like that. I just don't buy theft as a reason to close those stores. </p><p></p><p>If those stores weren't doing enough business, that is a legitimate reason to close and would be so stated.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2736910, member: 745"] They can't just fire them without some just cause. The unemployment 'insurance' they will have to pay for a store full of employees would max out their rate. Besides, it was stated that the problem was theft. Employee pilfering is cause enough to fire them without running the risk of an increase in unemployment insurance. Someone fired for a just cause cannot collect unemployment compensation. So, we're back to shoplifting and loss prevention officers. Also note that a certain amount of loss due to theft is built into the price of everything that is sold in stores like that. I just don't buy theft as a reason to close those stores. If those stores weren't doing enough business, that is a legitimate reason to close and would be so stated. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Real reason Wal-Mart closed stores
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom