Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Rear ended by OKC police. They do not carry auto insurance
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inactive" data-source="post: 3239095" data-attributes="member: 7488"><p>I'm not sure I follow what that changes? She's still going to recoup damages for the vehicle and the personal injury from the City, since the officer was acting in his capacity as an employee when he smashed the Taurus. Of course he's liable, but the city is the one providing the settlement on his behalf since the liability is transferred to him. </p><p></p><p>It's not a matter of gross negligence or a willful act of harm (or suppression of evidence), which are what typically leads to being able to pursue a civil claim against an individual law enforcement officer.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also [USER=15054]@swampratt[/USER] that car is 100% a total. Oof.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inactive, post: 3239095, member: 7488"] I'm not sure I follow what that changes? She's still going to recoup damages for the vehicle and the personal injury from the City, since the officer was acting in his capacity as an employee when he smashed the Taurus. Of course he's liable, but the city is the one providing the settlement on his behalf since the liability is transferred to him. It's not a matter of gross negligence or a willful act of harm (or suppression of evidence), which are what typically leads to being able to pursue a civil claim against an individual law enforcement officer. Also [USER=15054]@swampratt[/USER] that car is 100% a total. Oof. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Rear ended by OKC police. They do not carry auto insurance
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom