Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
remote camping spots?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow" data-source="post: 1275427" data-attributes="member: 7123"><p>If you were to eliminate the bolded one, there are plenty of spots like that. The managers of public lands have been all but forced to disallow shooting on public lands, because the end result is always invariably the same: Slob shooters ruin it for everyone, because they leave their broken targets and shells on the ground, and/or are unsafe. So there's very good reason shooting is no longer allowed in public areas. They always end up becoming trashed eyesores. Always. People invariably actually bring appliances out to such places to shoot up and leave them there.</p><p></p><p>If we didn't have slob shooters and hunters, this wouldn't be the case. But I don't know how to eliminate them from the planet anytime soon. </p><p></p><p>Another reason, besides the trash issue, is that poachers abuse the privilege and hunt out of season. If the land managers/game wardens were to ignore shots heard, a LOT of poaching would go on undetected - that is to say, a lot MORE than already goes on.</p><p></p><p>If you want to shoot, of necessity, you need to buy or get permission for private land, or join a range with a burm (berm?).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, post: 1275427, member: 7123"] If you were to eliminate the bolded one, there are plenty of spots like that. The managers of public lands have been all but forced to disallow shooting on public lands, because the end result is always invariably the same: Slob shooters ruin it for everyone, because they leave their broken targets and shells on the ground, and/or are unsafe. So there's very good reason shooting is no longer allowed in public areas. They always end up becoming trashed eyesores. Always. People invariably actually bring appliances out to such places to shoot up and leave them there. If we didn't have slob shooters and hunters, this wouldn't be the case. But I don't know how to eliminate them from the planet anytime soon. Another reason, besides the trash issue, is that poachers abuse the privilege and hunt out of season. If the land managers/game wardens were to ignore shots heard, a LOT of poaching would go on undetected - that is to say, a lot MORE than already goes on. If you want to shoot, of necessity, you need to buy or get permission for private land, or join a range with a burm (berm?). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
remote camping spots?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom