Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Republicans for Obama
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RidgeHunter" data-source="post: 1719015" data-attributes="member: 4319"><p>I'm not missing the word "not". He's saying marriage is not a homosexual union, just like it's not pedophilia or bestiality...which is a totally insane, asinine and classless comparison for a United States senator to make during an interview, regardless of his views on same-sex marriage. He's talking about fawking dogs in an interview, and there's really not a way you can twist it to make it sound uncrazy. </p><p></p><p>He's arguing for state's rights? Gimme a break. He's arguing for theocracy, big government, and and social engineering. The sheer amount of time he spends talking about bodily fluids, gays and dogsex shows where his priorities are, and that's Crazyville. He's said he would not vote for these laws? What happened to the RickN that says politicians will say anything to get elected? Or does that just apply to Ron Paul?</p><p></p><p>As far as a right to privacy, right - it's not mentioned in the Constitution. First of all, that alone doesn't mean it doesn't exist (enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny blah bitty blah blah). Second of all, it's pretty clear by the first, third and fifth amendments that the guys who came up with that thing had a right to privacy in mind. Freedom does not exist without a right to privacy.</p><p></p><p>Like I say, nobody is a fanatic if you happen to agree with their fanaticism.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RidgeHunter, post: 1719015, member: 4319"] I'm not missing the word "not". He's saying marriage is not a homosexual union, just like it's not pedophilia or bestiality...which is a totally insane, asinine and classless comparison for a United States senator to make during an interview, regardless of his views on same-sex marriage. He's talking about fawking dogs in an interview, and there's really not a way you can twist it to make it sound uncrazy. He's arguing for state's rights? Gimme a break. He's arguing for theocracy, big government, and and social engineering. The sheer amount of time he spends talking about bodily fluids, gays and dogsex shows where his priorities are, and that's Crazyville. He's said he would not vote for these laws? What happened to the RickN that says politicians will say anything to get elected? Or does that just apply to Ron Paul? As far as a right to privacy, right - it's not mentioned in the Constitution. First of all, that alone doesn't mean it doesn't exist (enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny blah bitty blah blah). Second of all, it's pretty clear by the first, third and fifth amendments that the guys who came up with that thing had a right to privacy in mind. Freedom does not exist without a right to privacy. Like I say, nobody is a fanatic if you happen to agree with their fanaticism. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Republicans for Obama
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom