Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Ruger LC9 thoughts
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1911user" data-source="post: 1521936" data-attributes="member: 543"><p>For a small, single-stack 9mm, I'd buy a Kahr 9mm instead; probably the CW9. </p><p>It has no tiny thumb safety, mag disconnect, or annoying loaded chamber indicator. </p><p>Ruger can add the excess safety baggage to their pistols and I can choose not to buy because of it.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I don't hate Ruger guns, just the idea of having to remove the nanny-state extras before practical use. Other companies sell without the extra baggage; Ruger <u>could</u> do the same.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1911user, post: 1521936, member: 543"] For a small, single-stack 9mm, I'd buy a Kahr 9mm instead; probably the CW9. It has no tiny thumb safety, mag disconnect, or annoying loaded chamber indicator. Ruger can add the excess safety baggage to their pistols and I can choose not to buy because of it. EDIT: I don't hate Ruger guns, just the idea of having to remove the nanny-state extras before practical use. Other companies sell without the extra baggage; Ruger [U]could[/U] do the same. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Ruger LC9 thoughts
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom