Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Ryan Walters is freaking the HE double chopsticks out of the libs
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3846160" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>No, it doesn’t. If anything it proves that more could be spent per student if there were fewer districts. It’s proportionally inverse to the spending per student. There is absolutely no justification for such a lopsided and excessive number of districts. </p><p></p><p>Oklahoma probably runs leaner than the other states in spite of the ridiculous number of districts we have, not because of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3846160, member: 1132"] No, it doesn’t. If anything it proves that more could be spent per student if there were fewer districts. It’s proportionally inverse to the spending per student. There is absolutely no justification for such a lopsided and excessive number of districts. Oklahoma probably runs leaner than the other states in spite of the ridiculous number of districts we have, not because of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Ryan Walters is freaking the HE double chopsticks out of the libs
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom