Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W 342 vs 340
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="backspur" data-source="post: 651248" data-attributes="member: 3034"><p>Plus, you get a big 'ol pocket full of humpback ugliness. <img src="/images/smilies/wink2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink2 :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p></p><p>I'm a firm beliver in the hammerless persuasion. It is the most compact and snagfree. Single action in close range personal defense gun seems pointless to me. If you do decide to go hammerless you might consider the 442/642. It's a couple of ounces heavier than the 340 or 342, but also a couple hundred dollars cheaper.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="backspur, post: 651248, member: 3034"] Plus, you get a big 'ol pocket full of humpback ugliness. :wink2: I'm a firm beliver in the hammerless persuasion. It is the most compact and snagfree. Single action in close range personal defense gun seems pointless to me. If you do decide to go hammerless you might consider the 442/642. It's a couple of ounces heavier than the 340 or 342, but also a couple hundred dollars cheaper. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W 342 vs 340
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom