Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W 38-1 Range Report
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HFS" data-source="post: 826413" data-attributes="member: 8862"><p>Quote:</p><p>It shoots very well, but (it feels like it) kicks much harder than the 642 I compared it with. The 642 has the factory rubber panels which help a lot. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The different grips have to be a factor. And, it may just be my imagination, but it seems like the Centennial type (42/642) guns sit just a bit lower in the hand than the external hammer guns (Chief Spl or Bodyguard).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HFS, post: 826413, member: 8862"] Quote: It shoots very well, but (it feels like it) kicks much harder than the 642 I compared it with. The 642 has the factory rubber panels which help a lot. The different grips have to be a factor. And, it may just be my imagination, but it seems like the Centennial type (42/642) guns sit just a bit lower in the hand than the external hammer guns (Chief Spl or Bodyguard). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W 38-1 Range Report
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom