Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W M&P Compact 2.0 40 S&W Specs.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="neokshooter" data-source="post: 3177242" data-attributes="member: 34817"><p>Okay I've already passed all these steps. Well actually I haven't fondled but if they were in front of me I would. I'm pretty well convinced that one of these two is going to wind up at my house in the not too distant future. The question remains...which one? This is going to be for concealed carry so what I'm trying to determine is if the added height, weight and width of the 2.0 compact is going to out weigh the increase in magazine capacity ? Would I be better off from a concealability standpoint to go with the smaller single stack? If I could fondle these two weapons I would most likely know the answer to my question but I don't have that option right now. I believe barrel length is 3.1" (Shield) and 3.6" 2.0 compact. Overall length is 6.1" and 6.8" respectively. I just can not find specs for height and width for either model.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="neokshooter, post: 3177242, member: 34817"] Okay I've already passed all these steps. Well actually I haven't fondled but if they were in front of me I would. I'm pretty well convinced that one of these two is going to wind up at my house in the not too distant future. The question remains...which one? This is going to be for concealed carry so what I'm trying to determine is if the added height, weight and width of the 2.0 compact is going to out weigh the increase in magazine capacity ? Would I be better off from a concealability standpoint to go with the smaller single stack? If I could fondle these two weapons I would most likely know the answer to my question but I don't have that option right now. I believe barrel length is 3.1" (Shield) and 3.6" 2.0 compact. Overall length is 6.1" and 6.8" respectively. I just can not find specs for height and width for either model. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W M&P Compact 2.0 40 S&W Specs.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom