Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W M&P Compact 2.0 40 S&W Specs.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jwryan84" data-source="post: 3177250" data-attributes="member: 8933"><p>I'd go 9, as you will get more capacity and less recoil. Recommend 147 grain as it is also less recoil compaired to 115 +P etc.</p><p></p><p>I've been eying a 3.6 in 9mm, just want to feel it first.</p><p></p><p>Summer carrier the shield would be nicer and winter you can conceal easier so double stack is nice.</p><p></p><p>I carry glock 43 in pocket during the summer and a P-07 during the winter. I def like having double the ammo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jwryan84, post: 3177250, member: 8933"] I'd go 9, as you will get more capacity and less recoil. Recommend 147 grain as it is also less recoil compaired to 115 +P etc. I've been eying a 3.6 in 9mm, just want to feel it first. Summer carrier the shield would be nicer and winter you can conceal easier so double stack is nice. I carry glock 43 in pocket during the summer and a P-07 during the winter. I def like having double the ammo. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
S&W M&P Compact 2.0 40 S&W Specs.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom