Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sanders asked to leave restaurant
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3129107" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>I'll try to phrase this the best way I can so that it doesn't sound like I'm saying you're wrong, because that is not what I'm trying to say. I've always taken what science has taught us with a small grain of doubt. In some sciences, that grain is microscopic, in others it can be seen by the naked eye. The laws we have in physical science are sound being they are based on countless observations that back them up. But we have to remember that these observations are based on conditions that we have here on earth and conducted with the current technology. Yes, this is wishful thinking bordering on insanity, but we never know what tomorrow may bring. Take Newton's 2nd law and the general theory of relativity. For a long time the scientific community took both of these as absolute, until they started measuring galaxy rotational curve on surrounding galaxies. Based on these two the gases and matter around galaxies should slow down the further they get from the center of the galaxy, however that is not the case. This is where the theory of dark matter came about, to explain why gases and matter hit a certain speed then plateaued instead of slowing down. Now they are looking at revised versions of both Newton's second law and Einstein's general theory of relativity. </p><p></p><p>As science advances so does our understanding, and things that were once explained one way now have a different explanation. </p><p></p><p>Either way, I would like to see more research done into either new fuel that is renewable and/or revisiting existing fuel sources. I'm not saying give up fossil fuels and force a change, rather lets work towards energy that is clean and renewable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3129107, member: 43724"] I'll try to phrase this the best way I can so that it doesn't sound like I'm saying you're wrong, because that is not what I'm trying to say. I've always taken what science has taught us with a small grain of doubt. In some sciences, that grain is microscopic, in others it can be seen by the naked eye. The laws we have in physical science are sound being they are based on countless observations that back them up. But we have to remember that these observations are based on conditions that we have here on earth and conducted with the current technology. Yes, this is wishful thinking bordering on insanity, but we never know what tomorrow may bring. Take Newton's 2nd law and the general theory of relativity. For a long time the scientific community took both of these as absolute, until they started measuring galaxy rotational curve on surrounding galaxies. Based on these two the gases and matter around galaxies should slow down the further they get from the center of the galaxy, however that is not the case. This is where the theory of dark matter came about, to explain why gases and matter hit a certain speed then plateaued instead of slowing down. Now they are looking at revised versions of both Newton's second law and Einstein's general theory of relativity. As science advances so does our understanding, and things that were once explained one way now have a different explanation. Either way, I would like to see more research done into either new fuel that is renewable and/or revisiting existing fuel sources. I'm not saying give up fossil fuels and force a change, rather lets work towards energy that is clean and renewable. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sanders asked to leave restaurant
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom