Sbr...

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

338Shooter

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
17,338
Reaction score
26
Location
Get off my lawn.
You could also have the dealer or a buddy hold on to the upper while you wait for the stamp if you find a good deal. Or you could buy a virgin receiver and built it into a pistol and shoot it without a stock until your stamp comes in. Then slap on a stock and boom, SBR.
 

stewball

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmond
The only ones I've seen usually have the "trust" engraved on the receiver. How does an individual sell a weapon like this, or can it be sold. How does that work?
 

CAR-AR-M16

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
5,821
Reaction score
307
Location
Duncan
The only ones I've seen usually have the "trust" engraved on the receiver. How does an individual sell a weapon like this, or can it be sold. How does that work?

The person who has their trust or individual name engraved on the receiver built the SBR on a Form 1 and hence they are the maker of the Title 2 firearm just as Colt, Bushmaster, etc.. was the manufacturer of the Title 1 firearm that was SBR'd. Makers/manufacturers are required to engrave their info on the firearm. If the individual/trust wants to sell the firearm it would simply transfer out on a Form 4. The markings remain as they were still the maker of the Title 2 firearm.

For example, Remington made my 870 and has their info on the receiver. I filed a Form 1 to make it an SBS and my info is engraved on there as well. If I were to sell it to you we would fill out a Form 4 and transfer when it is approved. No other engraving would be required.
 

WhiteyMacD

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
8,173
Reaction score
60
Location
Mustang
It is Constructive Possession, not Constructive Intent. Contructive Intent is a commonly misused term.

Semantics dude, seriously. Is it really that important to use the exact term from the law? Or will people get the point? Is this a "I know more about BATFE" pissing match?
The definitions of the two are exactly the same: The power to control without actual possession.
 

CAR-AR-M16

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
5,821
Reaction score
307
Location
Duncan
Semantics dude, seriously. Is it really that important to use the exact term from the law? Or will people get the point? Is this a "I know more about BATFE" pissing match, cause when you start arguing semantics, it seems like it is. If so, FAIL.

The definitions of the two are exactly the same: The power to control without actual possession.

I am in no pissing match with you and I apologize if I offended you in any way. I was just trying to keep folks from perpetuating incorrect terms. I actually do believe it is important to use the exact term from the law and I see so much incorrect info posted in regards to NFA stuff that I am just trying to help.

Since you seem to have a personal problem with me I will not bother to respond to any more posts you make.
 

WhiteyMacD

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
8,173
Reaction score
60
Location
Mustang
I am in no pissing match with you and I apologize if I offended you in any way. I was just trying to keep folks from perpetuating incorrect terms. I actually do believe it is important to use the exact term from the law and I see so much incorrect info posted in regards to NFA stuff that I am just trying to help.

Since you seem to have a personal problem with me I will not bother to respond to any more posts you make.

Sorry. A month of sleepless nights from a newborn and other daily frustrations took control of the words I used.

I agree, the term used in the law is most likely best, but it is semantical.
 

CAR-AR-M16

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
5,821
Reaction score
307
Location
Duncan
Sorry. A month of sleepless nights from a newborn and other daily frustrations took control of the words I used.

I agree, the term used in the law is most likely best, but it is semantical.

:kiss: No problem. I understand (I have a sick wife and 9 year old daughter right now).

I am going to be taking a break from the site for a while though. It just isn't as enjoyable as it was years ago.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom