Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
SBRs vs pistols
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="POKE1911" data-source="post: 3135190" data-attributes="member: 24536"><p>M</p><p></p><p></p><p>FWIW my opinion based off of the research that I have done in the past. I’m not a lawyer but this is the conclusion that I have come to.</p><p></p><p>The way I see it is that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. They have to prove that is what you have / intend on illegally modifying that pistol into an SBR. Whether you own an SBR or Pistol, many recommend having a pistol or registered sbr lower for every short upper that you have. The reason being is that you can switch out the upper without modification to the firearm, illegally making an SBR. So if you have a pistol upper on the pistol lower and a rifle upper on a rifle lower. You are fine because that’s how it’s intended to be. If you have a pistol upper and no pistol lower they could make a case that you have and upper for the purpose of switching out with your rifle lower without modification. You can own other parts because they would require modifications to the pistol to become an illegal SBR. The terminology of modification and manufacturing is the main distinction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="POKE1911, post: 3135190, member: 24536"] M FWIW my opinion based off of the research that I have done in the past. I’m not a lawyer but this is the conclusion that I have come to. The way I see it is that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. They have to prove that is what you have / intend on illegally modifying that pistol into an SBR. Whether you own an SBR or Pistol, many recommend having a pistol or registered sbr lower for every short upper that you have. The reason being is that you can switch out the upper without modification to the firearm, illegally making an SBR. So if you have a pistol upper on the pistol lower and a rifle upper on a rifle lower. You are fine because that’s how it’s intended to be. If you have a pistol upper and no pistol lower they could make a case that you have and upper for the purpose of switching out with your rifle lower without modification. You can own other parts because they would require modifications to the pistol to become an illegal SBR. The terminology of modification and manufacturing is the main distinction. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
SBRs vs pistols
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom