Second Taser Related Death From OKCPD since July

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

AKguy1985

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
25,950
Reaction score
4,804
Location
Rogers County
Of foremost notice is Swift's invention of the electric rifle, a gun which fires bolts of electricity. The electric rifle can be calibrated to different levels of range, intensity and lethality; it can shoot through solid walls without leaving a hole, and is powerful enough to kill a rampaging whale, as in their steamer trek to Africa. With the electric rifle, Tom and friends bring down elephants, rhinoceroses, and buffalo, and save their lives several times in pitched battle with the red pygmies. It also can discharge a globe of light that was described as being able to maintain itself, like ball lightning, making hunting at night much safer in the dark of Africa. In appearance, the rifle looked very much like its contemporary conventional cousins.

Sounds kinda dangerous to me.......:w000t::rollingla


Lightning gun from District 9????
 

purplehaze

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
6,341
Reaction score
0
Location
Jupiter
You might want to talk to your 9th grade science teacher and get your money back. A moderator put up this avatar without my permission so talk to them about my avatar.


Actually anyone who has been through 9th grade science knows shocking someone with high voltage has NOTHING to do with it. What kills people is amps. Speaking of ignoring the facts........
And please resize your avatar. It's retaded big, atleast on my iPhone.

Dennis. 'takeing someone down' isn't the issue. Taking custody and control is, and they are two different animals. Taking someone down is only half the fight, if that. Controlling someone tweaking on meth, Tripple C, PCP etc is something else, quite a ride and very dangerous. The don't feel pain don't give a ****. Wristlock? Pain compliance doesn't work. Armbar? Break it. They don't care. Ground and pound? Better know them out. It can be done, but it's another animal and deploying the Taser is much safer for both parties.

Shoot, big difference between escorting a drunk and a balls to the wall fight with someone on one of the 3 drugs I listed. They don't want to go to jail/prison, and some will kill you to keep from going.

ETA: Shoot, Officers sue for serious injuries suffered in PT, driver training, defensive tactics, PR24 (nigt stick) training, OC traing etc all of the time. Like Ive said many times: this is life, it isn't safe or fun sometimes.
 

Regina

Marksman
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma City
It's hard to believe that there are now 126 posts on this subject and the autopsy hasn't even been released yet. If we're going to say the man "allegedly" hit his wife then surely we can extend the "innocent until proven guilty" demeanor to the officers involved and the equipment used until we have some proof.
 

purplehaze

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
6,341
Reaction score
0
Location
Jupiter
Actually, most of the posters are saying he deserved what he got whether he is guilty or not. The taser is deadly crowd (me and s4f) is merely saying a taser is sometimes fatal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top Bottom