Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Self- inflicted ?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2068753" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>I beg to differ. The point of 2A is to provide an armed citizenry that can resist a standing army sent by a tyrannical power that would want to exercise its will over the people of any state in he Union. </p><p>Hence the clause "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,</p><p>...."</p><p></p><p>In other words, citizens following tactical type training and having fun with it is perfectly within the realms of desirability. </p><p>It is fun. </p><p>It is our right. </p><p>Why should we pre-suppose that average citizens are to be denied arms that are in common use at the time amongst law enforcement? In other words, why should we only be allowed inferior arms? Some level of Training should be available to all of us. </p><p>Ultimately, the right to keep and bear arms is what makes you free. </p><p>Arms that give you the strength to repel a standing army commanded by a tyrant. </p><p>These TV shows in my mind show a very positive side to firearms and how the folks shooting them are from all walks of life and nice folk! </p><p></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2068753, member: 3553"] I beg to differ. The point of 2A is to provide an armed citizenry that can resist a standing army sent by a tyrannical power that would want to exercise its will over the people of any state in he Union. Hence the clause "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, ...." In other words, citizens following tactical type training and having fun with it is perfectly within the realms of desirability. It is fun. It is our right. Why should we pre-suppose that average citizens are to be denied arms that are in common use at the time amongst law enforcement? In other words, why should we only be allowed inferior arms? Some level of Training should be available to all of us. Ultimately, the right to keep and bear arms is what makes you free. Arms that give you the strength to repel a standing army commanded by a tyrant. These TV shows in my mind show a very positive side to firearms and how the folks shooting them are from all walks of life and nice folk! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Self- inflicted ?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom